A Lot Of Bullets For A Lot Of Them In our first look at Wesley Swift's Wednesday Night Bible Study, we found a session dated June 26th, 1968, which most likely took place in early March of that year. The reverse is probable here. The given date is in late March of 1968, while the content suggests it occurred sometime after the murder of US Senator Robert Kennedy, as Swift talked about him in the past tense and made references to bullets and burials. Assuming the latter represents some gloating very near Kennedy's death and burial, a probable date for this session would be June 12th, 1968. Interpolations by the tape's transcriber are in regular parentheses. All italics are my emphasis, and my comments are in square brackets. WARNING: If you choose to read the following material, be advised that it contains the words of Wesley A. Swift, the original leader of the racist extremist group known as Aryan Nations. The content is extremely offensive, especially as it is presented in the language of Christian scripture and represents a warped version of Christian beliefs. It is rightly classified as hate speech. WEDNESDAY NITE [sic] BIBLE STUDY[an obvious implicit argument here is that it's okay for you to shoot and kill anyone that you believe -- or are TOLD -- is "an anti-Christ," but more to the immediate point, it was one bullet that ultimately killed Robert Kennedy (and Martin Luther King, Jr., for that matter)-dwd] Remember now that Anti-Christ is going to come against your country because your country is a country of the Kingdom. The blessings of God are upon it. But anti-Christ will be against your nation. Will be against every process of Gods law. What God is for, they will be against. God is for segregation and they are for integration. God is for no interest, and they are for usury. God says thou shalt have no other gods before me, and they will bring them all in. Therefore, the way you tell anti-Christ is -- in the simplest way is that they are against the Christ. You can get a lot of Christians who throw away their heritage because they want to be ignorant. But they still don't deny the Christ. And 65% of your country and maybe more will be in this company. They are already admitting that. They say that 65% of the people of this country will fall out with the Democratic Party because of the attitude toward [President Lyndon] Johnson and Bobby Kennedy. And because of the wars. But they said that the minorities in the United States make up 30% and they can carry all the minorities.[Howard Rand was apparently a well-regarded Bible Prophecy prognosticator at one time-dwd] But it doesn't mean that just because the time is shortened for the Elect's sake that the world need not to be looking for his coming, because a lot of these false people who try to move in among 'My People' will say they are looking for the coming of the Messiah. For when HE comes, it will not be well with them. For He is going to bring destruction on their cities, and their houses, and their private property. And you know who that is. These are the false ones who say they are waiting for Messiah, when He has already come. And all of you have been redeemed, been saved. Yet all these kikes run around and say they are waiting for Messiah. This is what God is talking about. You couldn't pin it down any closer on people. I am going to site [cite] this. We are in turbulent times. We are seeing more and more violence. There is no question of this.----------------------------------------------- Oh What A Relief: Summary And Conclusion The most obvious problem posed by the Far Right Reverend Wesley Swift is the racist hate speech coming from a foundation of Christian ideology. That was not so hard to do, unfortunately, given certain aspects of Christian scripture and tradition far less admirable than others, as I've tried to demonstrate to some extent elsewhere. In essence, Swift found confirmation in those aspects for his profoundly racist orientation, veering overtly toward Nazism. That resulted in him providing a voice for a disturbingly warped, blasphemous, downright devilish travesty of what it means to be a Christian. And he supplied that voice, over and over again, in the form of a minister preaching from a pulpit, over three decades of American history. If that was all there was to it, we might put it down as an aberration and have some confidence knowing that such extremism has been marginalized and thought of as wrong-headed, even ridiculous, by most people. Americans can and should take pride in that fact. But some issues should not be obscured. As previously mentioned, researching the murders of US Senator Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King was the original reason for looking into all this. In Senator Kennedy's case, we know of a few potential Far Right connections. Jerry Owen's friend, Rev. Jonathan Perkins, was a former top associate of Gerald L. K. Smith. Michael Wayne (or Wien) was a suspect put in custody by hotel security immediately after the attack on Kennedy. He initially claimed to be Jewish but would later volunteer odd information about having visited a "Nazi store" in Glendale, California. And Khaibar Khan Gudarzian gave Wayne a ride -- home, allegedly -- from Kennedy's presidential campaign headquarters earlier that evening. So it's not clear what if any involvement he could have had in Wayne's later conspicuous appearance at the Ambassador Hotel. There's also an admittedly tenuous connection (because Wesley Swift's church in Los Angeles was on Figueroa Street) involving an allegation by an unidentified letter writer. The writer claimed that on the morning after the attack at the Ambassador Hotel, he saw a woman fitting a description of "the girl in the polka dot dress," who used keys to enter an automobile rental office at 7th and Figueroa Street opposite the Statler Hilton Hotel at about 9:00 a.m. and conducted herself as if she belonged and was employed there.... The girl then had the appearance of being hysterical and tired as if she had been out all night, and upon entering, wandered about the office as if in a daze, and finally sat down behind the counter and put her hands to her face as if taking a nap. If such a connection is tenuous, one between a car rental office in Los Angeles and an auto dealer meeting in Miami would seem entirely dubious. But it seems there was such a get-together in Miami that raised official investigative concerns about some plotting afoot to kill both Dr. King and Senator Kennedy. And since the FBI subsequently interviewed an unidentified clairvoyant about his having predicted the killings of both men -- a man who had also previously predicted President Kennedy's death (with the near certainty that Wesley A. Swift was questioned along those lines after the president's murder) -- there would seem some reason to think Swift best fits the profile of the prophet in question. That would be my best guess as to why the transcriber of Swift's taped sermon of March 31, 1968, decided to suppress the contents of the second half of the tape. We've seen that it's damned unlikely to have been censored for language, as in the use of words like kikes and niggers. And there doesn't seem to have been much concern about the controversial aspects of inciting people to violence, as that's likewise been very much on display (sort of a theme, really). And while we can presume that Swift's general absence from April to September of 1968 was due to health issues and convalescence (coincidental as that may seem), he apparently felt well enough to visit and inspire the flock on what may have been considered special occasions -- the first being two to three weeks after the murder of Dr. King, and then a few times later in the wake of Senator Kennedy's death (including what seem to be the only two sermons Swift delivered during his overall absence). So it's reasonable to think that what Swift had to say in the second half of the March 31st sermon was nothing as simple as his typical inflammatory hate speech, or even strong expressions of hopes that King and Kennedy would be removed from the world by the Hand of the Almighty. If the tape's transcriber found the "current events" it mentions too problematic for open viewing by the public, it was likely because the prophecies sounded a lot like specific instructions. Or they otherwise contained too much detail, as what might seem like incriminating evidence of something coming from sources a little closer to home than the Celestial Planes. I'll briefly address some other issues by way of closing this out. I assume with some confidence that certain people would complain that all this didn't pay nearly enough attention to the CIA. That's true, but over the years, I've found that so much "conspiracy theory" is indebted to paradigms of the Far Right that I long ago became skeptical of those who may have good reason to obscure evidence and interpretation in these matters. As such, it hardly makes sense to follow the John Birch Society's mandate of seeing the CIA everywhere. These are more like baby steps of an investigation, and I'm happy to leave it to those more familiar with the CIA to figure out its possible connections. My general conclusion regarding Wesley Swift's preaching is that he was a purveyor of some really bizarre ideas apart from the obvious racism. And in that light, it's not easy to take him seriously as a "mover and shaker" or "top man" (someone directing political assassinations, for instance). But what he had to say was considered Word of God among not just a few people here and there, but a good many whose beliefs and attitudes were aligned with those of the Ku Klux Klan(s) and other right-wing extremists. And if we want to investigate other connections he may have had that might be more directly significant, some things to think about would be his relocation to Lancaster, California (which grew and grew due to its proximity to what became Edwards Air Force Base), and other evidence of apparent closeness between the Far Right and the US military (like the alleged command "given" to Troy Haughton during a Field Training Exercise). A weightier issue is that while Wesley Swift's version of Christianity was obviously warped (into pure hatred), a good deal of his preaching covered the same themes and complaints of much more respectable Americans (then and now). The most relevant example is that of the ascendancy of religious conservatism in political debate in the United States since the 1970s. On the surface, the "Born Again Christian" movement was a revivalist phenomenon that involved a great many people who wanted to experience their religion in a more meaningful and personally fulfilling way, as an immediate sense of being "spiritually saved." But far too much of it was beholden to the interests of people and organizations with a reactionary political agenda. At the time, conservative white Southern preachers seriously maintained that their political involvement was "no different" than that of black preachers in the Civil Rights movement. That nicely obscured things as an "involvement in politics" issue (as opposed to problems of white backlash and institutionalized white supremacy). And since religious conservatives also tended to be Bible Prophecy believers, as Wesley Swift was, consideration and discussion of critical issues were often somehow guided by nonsense arguments. For instance, the idea that "being right with God" meant supporting the modern nation of Israel no matter what it does. Or that Bible Prophecy "showed" that Europe's Common Market was a "Revived Roman Empire," and the best way to keep the USA from being subjugated by the Antichrist was to elect Ronald Reagan as president. But Martin Luther King, Jr. never had a weekly television program, most of the people of Israel long ago chose Pharaohs and Fascists for their role models, and The End Of The World was not delayed due to the Berlin Wall being knocked down with one punch by Ronald Reagan. The beat goes on, and the relevance of the larger issue lies in the question of whether or not Americans are ready to explore certain unpleasant aspects of our recent history or will merely continue to ignore it. As for me, I'm always just glad when I don't have to read any more of Swift's shit. Return to Table of Contents |